Security Policy Enforcement and PCI ComplianceNew Boundary Technologies Cites Automating Security Configuration Management as Key to Protecting Cardholder Data Identity theft and payment card fraud go hand in hand. Protecting cardholder information
is a critical step in preventing both—and the financial losses that come
with them. This is a primary premise behind the Payment Card Industry (PCI) Data
Security Standard developed by Visa, MasterCard and other payment card providers.
Security threats to cardholder information can come from either side of the firewall.
They can result from malicious attacks by hackers intent on criminal activity,
from insiders intent on defrauding the company, or simply from negligent end users
with no malicious intent at all. But regardless of the source and nature of the
threat, payment card issuers, processors, and retailers have a vested interest
in protecting cardholder information.
The PCI Data Security Standard is complex and exacting, with 12 top-level rules
and 200 additional requirements for protecting cardholder information. Penalties
for non-compliance include fines of up to $500,000 per security incident and
possible loss of payment card transaction privileges. And as retailers have
come to learn, PCI adds one more layer of complexity and cost to their overall
compliance efforts. One year after the June 2005 deadline for PCI compliance,
just 22 percent of large merchants were actually in compliance with the mandate.
Retailers cite complexity and cost as the main reasons. Compounding the problem
is a lack of guidance in the PCI Data Security Standard regarding what technologies,
methodologies, and processes constitute best practices for information security.
For many retail organizations, locking down PCs and servers via automated
configuration management is the key to dramatically reducing the complexity
and cost of PCI Data Security Standard compliance.
Configuration management is not a new discipline, but only recently with the
advent of products like New Boundary Technologies’ Policy Commander has
it become sufficiently automated to deliver a strong return on investment. Manual
configuration management is time and resource intensive, even though it is often
necessary due to the issues that configuration problems can create. According
to an EMA analyst report, more than 60 percent of IT service impact is a direct
result of configuration problems. Which is why adopting automated configuration
management technologies can drive significant benefits in the areas of IT security,
risk mitigation, and compliance.
Traditional Security Limitations
In the early days of the PC, security typically involved scanning floppy disks
for viruses, locking computer cases, and limiting access with login passwords.
As networks became the dominant paradigm, the spread of malicious code increased,
with the potential for damage increasing in direct proportion to the number
of computers on the network. But with the advent of the Internet, a Pandora’s
Box of access was opened that still has IT professionals struggling to cope.
The Internet introduced and popularized e-mail, chat, instant messaging, peer-to-peer
file sharing, desktop search, and other communication channels and applications
that expose networks to malicious threats like never before. Because the Internet
introduced so many new openings into networks, IT security over the past decade
or more has been focused primarily on creating a strong defense perimeter around
the network.
Perimeter defense remains an essential component of an overall IT security
strategy. It incorporates a variety of technologies and applications designed
to limit and control access to the network and the information it contains.
This can include hardware and software firewalls, anti-virus applications, identity
authentication, spam filtering, intrusion detection, file encryption, vulnerability
scanning, virtual private networks, and anti-spyware applications. Unfortunately,
perimeter security remains a delicate balancing act that must simultaneously
restrict and allow access to information, systems, and resources. An incorrect
balance can result in excessive exposure of cardholder information to security
threats, or in a backlash from end-users unable to access the IT resources they
need to remain productive.
As perimeter defense has matured, threats have not been eliminated. Rather,
the nature and the origin of the threats have evolved. As perimeter defense
technologies matured, so did the hacker tools and strategies used to circumvent
them. As anti-virus systems improved, virus writers became more creative in
disguising their malicious code. And perhaps more important, the motives of
those seeking to infiltrate networks have changed. Once the domain of misguided
enthusiasts seeking notoriety within their underground community, the world
of hackers is now dominated by increasingly organized cyber-criminal enterprises
with a powerful profit motive.
The Future of Information Security
After more than a decade of evolution, network perimeter defenses are greatly
improved, but far from foolproof. External threats are becoming more sophisticated,
well funded, and increasingly criminal in nature. And once inside the perimeter,
malicious threats quickly and easily exploit what has remained for many years
the soft, unprotected underbelly of the network – the vulnerable configuration
state of individual computers. In addition, perimeter defenses do almost nothing
to protect electronic information from users with legitimate network access.
In fact, according to a survey by the Ponemon Institute, nearly 70 percent of
the threats to network security and integrity come from malicious employee activity
or non-malicious employee errors.
Clearly, network defense perimeters alone are insufficient, and that has resulted
in a new emphasis on reducing the vulnerabilities of the systems inside the
perimeter. While perimeter defenses are essential to managing threats from outside
the network, the key to internal network security lies in the discipline of
security configuration management. Integrating these two disciplines is necessary
to maintain a network environment that is secure from both external and internal
exploits.
Security Configuration Challenges
By default, few if any computer systems, and especially workstations, are configured
for strong security in a network environment. Even when new computers are provisioned
with secure configurations, they are still dynamic systems subject to random
configuration changes that can quickly render them insecure.
To further complicate matters, simply determining the security configuration
of a single computer has always been a manual, resource-intensive process. Determining
the security configuration of multiple systems becomes a daunting project. In
addition, PCs and servers can have multiple roles and multiple users and administrators.
In fact, the traditional barriers to determining security configuration are
so significant they often prevent administrators from simply knowing the security
states of their computers.
Given the difficulties involved, there is little wonder that IT focused its
security initiatives on perimeter control rather than on configuration management.
But with the recent introduction of technology solutions that automate security
configuration management, especially those based on automated security policy
enforcement like Policy Commander, nearly all of the traditional challenges
have been eliminated.
Security Policy Management – A Key to Compliance
In very simple terms, computer security policies are rules that computers must
obey. More specifically, they are configuration and access controls that determine
who can do what on any given computer. Policies include configurations and procedures
for achieving defined security levels related to password management, group
rights, file access, server configuration and a host of other functions. It
is important to differentiate computer security policies, which are computer
files in digital format, from corporate security policies, which are written
documents detailing an organization’s security requirements and mandates.
Computer security policies can come from software vendors like New Boundary
Technologies or Microsoft, or from IT security organizations like the National
Security Agency (NSA), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST),
United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team (US-CERT), and the SANS Institute.
Security policies can range from very simple ones that control a single configuration
setting (such as disabling Windows Update), to complex ‘best practices’
policies (also known as security templates or lockdown guides) that affect dozens
or even hundreds of configuration settings. Because security policies help to
standardize system configurations, they provide an organized framework for managing
security configuration settings across a network. They provide the efficiency,
flexibility, and extensibility required to make security configuration management
not only possible, but cost effective as well. However, until recently computer
security policies have had some traditional issues of their own.
While security policy management can dramatically improve the overall defense
posture of the network and lock down access to cardholder information, traditional
methods of implementing policies, such as Group Policy Objects, are inherently
complex, manual and require extensive IT expertise. In fact, many organizations
don’t leverage computer security policies at all, while others using traditional
methods struggle to manage them with limited IT resources and expertise. In
order for organizations to realize maximum benefit from security policies, they
need a way to quickly, easily and accurately deploy policies on all of the servers,
workstations and laptops accessing the network. Because computers are very dynamic
systems undergoing constant change, organizations also need to constantly monitor
them to determine their compliance with assigned policies, and to automatically
enforce policies on non-compliant computers. This requires a level of automation
that, until recently, simply didn’t exist.
With an automated security policy enforcement solution like Policy Commander,
IT professionals can secure workstations and servers quickly and easily. Policy
Commander leverages advanced Smart Update™ technology that precisely targets
security policies to the correct computers, saving considerable time and effort.
Once policies are assigned, Policy Commander continuously monitors computer
configurations, and automatically secures systems to their desired state in
the event of any configuration change. It allows IT professionals to create
a self-monitoring, self-healing security environment inside the firewall, dramatically
reducing the risk of security breaches and information theft from both external
and internal threats. And it demonstrates to auditors that real-time, continuous
monitoring and enforcement of secure computer configurations and cardholder
information are in place.
Powered by Policy Commander, the PCI Compliance Solution offered by New Boundary
Technologies can virtually eliminate default computer vulnerabilities that represent
the largest risks to cardholder information. The solution includes the company’s
PCI Security Guide, which breaks down the PCI data security provisions and offers
best practices guidance on meeting them. It also delivers a library of computer
security policies based on National Security Agency (NSA) and National Institute
of Standards and Technology (NIST) recommendations that address specific cardholder
information security concerns.
Reaping the Benefits of Automated Security Policy Management
When an IT security configuration template (i.e. lockdown guide) is applied
to a system, a substantial reduction in vulnerability exposure can be achieved.
In fact, testing by the NSA and NIST has shown that they will reduce the vulnerabilities
on systems by 90% or more. That means that all of the perimeter security measures
employed by an IT department only address about 10% of the vulnerabilities potentially
exploited by malware and malicious activity.
This is where the proper application of computer security policies provides
a significant increase in network and information security. Viruses and spyware
exploit the software defects in applications and vulnerable configurations of
the operating system. While good anti-virus and anti-spyware tools are required
to detect and remove malware, those tools are not designed to correct problems
in configuration areas such as insecure accounts, unnecessary services, file
permissions, or registry settings. In addition, they are essentially reactive
measures rather than proactive ones.
Automated security policy management is a relatively new technology that delivers
significant value as a key component of an overall security strategy empowering
security compliance. As the level of threats to network security continues to
rise, prudent retail organizations are adopting appropriate technologies to
minimize the risks associated with vulnerability exploits. Just as firewalls
and anti-virus applications have become a mainstay of protecting organizational
information and computing assets, an automated security policy enforcement solution
that enables proactive security configuration management should be considered
an essential component of the overall security measures that organizations covered
by the PCI Data Security Standard employ. Back Other articles by New Boundary TechnologiesPCI compliance gets easier By automating IT security, New Boundary Technologies is working to ease the pain of PCI compliance for organizations that accept payment cards or process payment card transactions.
|
Companies in this issue
|